Either way, its the M262 that I want to keepif(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_18',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Though I must admit, this experience has had me thinking that an M10 would be better suited to me now. After a few weeks of using the new Leica M262 I posted a review along with a few videos. Selling the M262, a camera that I purchased for its pure simplicity; and keeping the Z6, a camera that I purchased for its many features (including live view, a hybrid camera with fantastic video capabilities including full frame 4K, compatibility with my Profoto strobes, owning quite a bit of Nikon F-mount glass, auto-focus, etc.)! The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. Personally Id always choose an M without video capability, but thats personal preference. Additionally, I really like the simplified look and small upgrades the MP versions offer. The image on viewfinder of that camera is very warm yet when the images are loaded onto the computer they are less so. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. All other things aside, they, Leica M cameras, are unique. For a start, the battery in the M262 was a lot bigger than that in the M9. Source: DxOMark. I have preview turned off too and use it like I do my M6. I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. The M10 has the new ISO wheel on the top left. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. Basically, Im sold on live-view these days but, despite this fact, I didnt think it would appeal to me on a Leica. With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount . In the setup menu, the most used setting is white balance. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. When the Leica M262 was released, Leica proudly told the world that the menu had been reduced to two screens worth of features. With the M9, just going out for a day I would take two batteries. The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. Compared to when I shot with any other camera system, my gut feeling is I come away with fewer shotsless spray and pray . Then along comes the M262, digital Leica I'd been waiting for. Of course Im now retired and not doing imaging for a living. Epson RD1 style I loved my RD1! This might sound like a small criticism, and Im sure many wouldnt even notice or care, but actually it goes back to what I was saying earlier about familiarity. The upgrade to the M10 feels like its based on some fairly thin justifications, though I suspect (hope) that in practice just like swapping from M9 to M262 I will be pleasantly surprised by the fact that I find it brings more to the table than I expected. The Leica M262 feels to me like almost everything anyone could or should expect from a digital Leica rangefinder. It then required a short trip to camera-hospital in Germany. Menu. You cannot paste images directly. May be different sensor calibration? Bringing up the live-view display gave me what appeared to my taste to be a quite unpleasant representation of the world in front of the camera. I didnt discover this, despite that being how the M9 works. The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. If you arent aware of these lenses, they focus down to about 40cm. They take on a garish orange tint that is hard to process in LR. I missed his musings in AP. With regards to minimizing my digital camera gear, my thinking was simple. USA Distributor of MCM Equipment leica m240 vs m262 image quality Thankfully with the M10 theyve returned to the old system. As an M10 owner I should say that yes, this camera is definitely a less is more sort of gadget. The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken. Whats the best camera for around $2000? This is a useful feature for me that I enjoyed using the Fuji system which had a great focus peaking aid. Equally, Ive not found the dynamic range to be too limited. I hadnt noticed that it focused closer though. I bought it as temporary replacement camera after my M262 had to pay a little trip to Germany for some repair work. But the I needed a 21mm for crowd shots and discovered the live view is awesome for this. I could sell the M262, and my beloved Monochrom (and maybe a couple of lenses), thus satisfying the GAS problem and simultaneously slimming down my cameras without actually having to spend any more money or as my mate James would say, I could make this a revenue-neutral purchase. You can get two M-Ps (old and new) for the same price as one M10. Most of the digital M bodies are going to offer a satisfactory experience for the average first time Leica user. . Now, if the shutter was fully mechanical and cocked by hand that would be a very different thing. That breaks the rules by my measure, unfortunately . Reduction of features is something no other brand of cameras shouts about, ever. dslr . I have found that the shadows in the M10 can be pulled forever, which is great, because both cameras have about the same capacity to blow highlight details. as first digital Leica M, I'd take M (typ 262) but if the M (typ240) is cheaper, go ahead. Although I know right from the gate that my M-P Typ 240 wont get as much use as my new heart winning M9-P, it will however keep me from having that inevitable internal debate of owning just one old or new M body. And thats pushing it. The new Leica M is the most innovative and versatile M-Camera that the modern M-System has ever created. Funny thing that while the M10 launched, I ordered one early 2017 thinking this may be the M I waited for. Source: DxOMark. Well worth seeking out. One review even suggested that the M10 should be called the M11, with the M240 rightfully being the M10. Everything is very tactile. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. They didn't say it's a different sensor, they said different technology. Other new features include an expanded ISO range of 100 to 50000, 16 minute maximum exposure time, dynamic range equivalent of 13.5 stops, an on-screen level gauge, and super quiet . They've been even used in a documentary made by a friend of mine. The even newer M-P Typ 240 purchase just opens up addtional opportunities of using a digital M as a multi-purpose tool. I am including these 2 images taken from the same spot focusing on the same scene. This really piqued my interest. One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . Id prefer to do this with the Leica as its the camera I use most often and so the battery is always charged with space on a memory card. This friendly dig on Facebook from Alex Hakimi somewhat sums up how ridiculous all this really is: if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); Anyway, the point is, at one stage, not all that long ago, I was very happy with the M262 and didnt really feel like the M10 could possibly bring any advantages to me. As @Jeff Skindly pointed out (when I asked about the M262), this might be a better place to seek views and opinions on this model. As John said it beforeendless upgrades, hours to spend to edit files, digital, you take even more picturesthe iso dial is nice, but I prefer (for the sake of creativity versus being too convenient) Film and stick to my a la carte M7 with one lensecalms down your mind. With 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. Here is a quickreview and comparison for the Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 rangefinder cameras. The combination of the live view and the advantages I had begun to feel a physical ISO dial could bring to the table were then enough to have me wondering how much of my kit Id have to sell to change up to the M10. . If not, get the 262. With the wrong card, the wait before the shutter is again available is bad. I really have found it quite distracting to have an image preview thats different to what Im used to, especially since its both inaccurate and in a way thats unappealing to my tastes. Leica M Typ 240. Using the right SD card is key here. Mostly because of the need for a screen that I allude to. The body is pretty well weather sealed. Leica has issued new, updated firmware for the entire range of Leica M10 and M240-generation cameras. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. As I don't need money selling them "cheap", I'm happy to keep them all for what they are, using each one equally. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. I like to put my camera to my eye this live-view lark just doesnt appeal to me was the sort of sentence I likely uttered. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. Itd be a waste of time when you can go and find other reviews that no doubt do high ISO comparisons with other brands of cameras etc. Both are great cameras and either would be fine. The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . I find it very quick. - 35mmc, https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party, Nikon 28ti and 35ti - Mini-Review - By Ahmed Al Shorouqi, 5 frames with the Nikon FM2 & Agfa APX 400 in my Paris - By Martina Rigotti, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. - and the M240 in color. I soon found one on eBay for a price I was happy to pay and a few days later I had a chrome-finished M240 to keep my company whilst my poorly M262 was seen to by the camera-doctors. By Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. I'm in between the m262 bundle or a used 240. You can click any image for a larger view which is the best way to view it as this site compresses these down to what you see below . Fortunately, whilst the control of ISO isnt quite perfect, I have found the way exposure compensation works on the Leica M262 to be a big step up from the M9. Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. In fact, I could almost go as far to say that even this stripped back Leica has too many buttons and options for my needs! Water-resistant devices can resist the penetration of water, such as powerful water jets, but not being submerged into water. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! I upgraded from the M9 on single basis that I wanted a camera with a better screen. It seemed it was not much larger than an M7; that, alone, was enough to make me decide I would own one someday. Aluminium body makes is nice and light. This is particularly useful on long shoots when you need more space. Fortunately, when the image popped up in Lightroom, it was fine or at least it was little different to a photo that I might have expected out of the M262. I just recently bought a Leica M262, interestingly I read your blog and it actually helped encourage me to buy it. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. I use the 1.4 magnifier with my old 90mm tele-elmarit and an external viewfinder with my voigtlander 21mm f1.4 both work just fine for me. The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder camera announced by Leica Camera on November 19, 2015. On 12/27/2020 at 11:24 AM, a.noctilux said: On 12/27/2020 at 12:24 PM, a.noctilux said: Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount , https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. Why torture yourself? Nice write-up. I have used many rangefinders, a Leica M8, M9 (and its variants M-E/M9P/MM), M262, M240P and of course most recently the M-D 262. It's slightly lighter than the 240 and I have no use for video nor live view in a Leica. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. Plus it's lighter. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor. This isnt me highlighting something bad though, it makes no difference to anything really. It has a better screen, live-view, no video and even has a ISO dial (like you might find on a Fuji). Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. That said, M10 GAS is real. Bear in mind I have not held or shot an M10, my information comes from extensive reading of user experiences. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. One is not better or worse than the other, they are just different. I did the same thing Hamish, never having handled the M10. I find the M262 colours different enough from the M-P I just sold - to my eye the blues, reds, aquas and purples feel denser. Verified purchase: Yes | Condition . The use of a CMOS sensor allowed Leica to include two key features that the previous M9 didnt have. It doesnt even have any way to connect the Atomos to it. Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Hi Hamish, I have used an M240 extensively for the last 18 months. But, as someone who shoots, buys and sells a lot of different lenses, the bigger screen would definitely offer me an advantage Id be able to take photos and check lenses were calibrated properly etc. I pressed the shutter button to take a photo and was fairly disappointed to see that the image the live-view screen had showed me was now captured as a photo. 20% better video recording quality (main camera), Has continuous autofocus when recording movies, has continuous autofocus when recording movies. To begin with, I tried put the idea to the back of my mind, then one day I opened the cupboard a saw my Monochrom sat there looking underused. Whats cool about having a Z6 (or other similar mirrorless camera) is that I can easily adapt the Leica M glass. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. I decided that I wanted to keep the one camera that can do close to everything I need in the digital world (and for me, this includes personal and occasional professional work, mostly product still photography, but also videography).
